On Mon, Mar 28, 2016
at 12:03 AM
Alan Hieger wrote:
Subject: VCB Weekly Nag 3-28-16
Today is Monday.
Like the fulfillment of the venerable Chinese curse, we “live in
interesting times.”
Official Club Business
Basin Access in Jeopardy
Well, that got
your attention, didn’t it?
Although I normally
dispose of my daily e-mail before dawn, I went on-line close to midday Thursday
to conduct some “business” business, and discovered the following letter from
Jerry Silver:
Dear Ms. Lamb,
I am a long-time member
and officer of the “Valley Circle Burners” which is a model airplane club
specializing in control-line model aviation activities. Our flying site is
adjacent to the “San Fernando Valley R/C Flyers”. I just received the following
notification today (Wed., March 23, 2016) and it says that our response must be
received by Wed. Does this mean today?
My only response to this
proposed closing of our site, for the entire month of Oct., is that this is
totally unacceptable. We hold a major contest that month and we have been doing
so for approx. 25 consecutive years.
Changing our event date would be virtually impossible. Anything that the Core
can do to prevent this closing will be most appreciated.
Thank you for your
consideration in this matter,
Respectfully,
Jerry Silver
Subsequent research by
Ray Firkins has uncovered a proposal for a multi-day music festival, to be
named Angelfest, which promises to bring 65,000 spectators to the Basin each
October for the foreseeable future. Thanks to Ray, you may view the
actual proposal filed with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. You will
find the text of the proposal as an attachment at the tail end of the Nag,
because it is just too long for inclusion in the body of the rag/mag.
Because I received this
info at a time that most normal people are working, and because an urgent
response was required (if not already too late), I dashed off the following
letter to Laurence Tougas, the AMA District X Vice President:
Dear Larry,
I am forwarding for your
attention an e-mail I received today from the Valley Circle Burners' Club
Safety Officer. As the club's Secretary, I felt this should be brought to
the attention of yourself as AMA's representative for the district. It
appears that plans are pending to shut down the Sepulveda Basin Recreation Area
for the month of October, beginning this year, and in perpetuity. As this
is the only significant flying site utilized both by the Valley Circle Burners
and the Valley Flyers r/c club, and additionally used by non-club sport flyers,
park flyers, and multirotor enthusiasts, this action has the potential to
significantly disrupt aeromodelling activities of all kinds throughout
the northern L.A. County area.
We apparently have only
today to raise any objections. There has been, to my knowledge, no
previous notification of this intent, and we (club officers) feel totally
blindsided.
Anything AMA can do to
assist us in this matter would of course be greatly appreciated. I will
attempt to follow up with you via phone.
Thank you in advance for
your interest.
Alan Hieger
Secretary, Valley Circle
Burners
AMA# 69272
Phone: 805-210-2011
Fearing that a full day
might pass before the letter got read, I immediately followed up with Laurence
by phone. He agreed to write a brief letter to the Corps supporting our
interests. The text of that letter follows.
Dear Ms. Lamb,
I represent model aircraft enthusiasts in the south western United States for the Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA). The AMA is a nationwide organization that promotes the safe and responsible operation of model aircraft for leisure, competition, and education.
It was brought to my attention that there may be
a desire to close the field for the month of October 2016 and future
years. I'd like to confirm if that is correct. If it is I'd like to
arrange for the field's users to be able to submit feedback on any such plans.
There are over 400 AMA members that regularly operate
model aircraft from this field. It is the preeminent public model
aircraft field in Southern California, and its loss would be keenly felt.
Please let me know if the information I've been
sent is correct. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Lawrence Tougas
At his suggestion, I
also drafted and sent a letter in the name of the club, which reads like this:
Dear Ms. Lamb,
I am the Secretary of
the Valley Circle Burners, an L.A. area-based aeromodeling club which utilizes
the Sepulveda Basin Recreation Area as its base of operations. It has
come to my attention that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is considering a plan
to close the Basin to modeling activities for the month of October on an annual
basis. My purpose in contacting you is to provide you with information of
which you might not currently be aware in hopes of dissuading this action.
The airfield in
question, located to the West of Woodley Avenue between Victory and Burbank
Boulevards, is home to the Valley Flyers (radio control emphasis) and the
Valley Circle Burners (control-line emphasis) clubs. These clubs are
chartered entities of the Academy of Model Aeronautics, which operates under
the aegis of the National Aeronautic Administration as the official national
representative of American aeromodelers. In addition, the site is
routinely utilized by "park flyers" (radio-controlled aircraft of
minimal weight and range) and "drone" enthusiasts from both the AMA
membership and the general public.
Closure of the Basin for
a full month each year would be massively disruptive to the entire aeromodeling
community throughout the northern Los Angeles County and Ventura County areas.
Firstly, there is simply no comparable facility within an hour's drive,
and one would expect dispersal of such activities to less well-suited and
potentially less controlled areas. This has potential public safety
implications. There has been considerable concern of late regarding the
activities of so-called "drone" operators: so much so that a national
registry has been put into place. Sadly, many "dronists" (my
term) operate outside of the AMA's sphere of influence, and are not well-schooled
in safety issues. The availability of the Basin brings them into contact
with AMA-trained flyers, who then have the opportunity to educate them
regarding appropriate procedures and practices. Loss of the Basin would
essentially put these people out into the general public without such
education.
In addition, both
chartered clubs conduct multiple annual competitions at the Basin, and have
done so according to a schedule which has remained essentially unchanged for
decades. These competitions draw flyers from all around the country, and
occasionally from foreign nations. In addition to the potential
disruption of travel and/or vacation plans already established, it must be
noted that these competitions are scheduled in coordination with other events
occurring nationwide, so that the loss of use of the Basin over this period can
be expected to have a cascade effect across multiple states.
Speaking for my club as
an officer, we would welcome the opportunity to meet with you or another
designated representative of the Corps to present our case and explore ways in
which the Corps could achieve its objectives without the major disruption which
is currently envisioned. I would be happy to address any concerns which
you might have in the interim. I can be reached at this e-mail address,
or by telephone at 805-210-2011.
Thank you for your
consideration in this matter.
Respectfully yours,
Alan Hieger
Secretary, Valley Circle
Burners
At this point, all club
officers are up to speed on the situation. Ray will be taking point on
this issue going forward. It is by no means certain that this is a done
deal. There are issues concerning how such a festival might impact the
Basin’s dual functions as a flood control facility and a wildlife refuge.
Updates will be provided as information becomes available. For the
moment, you all now know as much about this as me.
Bylaws
To date there has been
no response to my quest for a copy of our existing bylaws. Though I still
encourage anyone who might possess one to conduct some home archeology, my
search is now officially in Nancy Drew mode.
May Meet
Per Terry Thorkildsen,
the sanction (Class C) for our May Fun Fly/Uncontest/Swap Meet is now
officially on file, and we are go for liftoff on Saturday, May 21. As
details become available, you’ll see them here.
Basin Activity
On Sunday, March 20, a
baker’s half-dozen flyers turned out on an overcast morning to scribe on the
sky. Thanks to Steve Schiff for providing details.
Perry Ohal showed up
with his LA .46-powered Brodak P-40. Apparently the combo acquitted
itself well and gave Perry some nice flights. Dave Hull was out with his
Cardinal (profile?) powered by an LA .40 and an OS .30-powered Top Flight
Combat Streak. Apparently he was plagued by inconsistent runs from both
engines (“one too lean, the next too rich”). Terry Thorkildsen apparently
“enjoyed” similar “fun” from his Fox .15, a motor known throughout California
for its suitability as a paperweight and renowned for its hurlability
characteristics. The identity of the airframe thus “powered” was not
specified. Terry? Steve himself brought out a Primary Force powered
by an Evolution. Apparently Steve considers its cost ($75) to be more
significant than its displacement, which he did not note. He also brought
out his Gordon Delaney-designed Pathfinder profile, with a hybrid (classical
Greek word meaning “bastard”) motor comprised of Tower .40 externals and OS .40
(-S or FP? Certainly not LA?) “guts.” Kestas Dvarvydis and Alon
Yehzkelof were also present, but tech data on their birds is not available.
It’s probably not too much of a reach to guess that Alon was campaigning
his Tehila, which is his interpretation of Dave Trible’s Super Shameless
design, but he can correct me if I‘ve gotten this wrong.
Chris Forbes had
indicated intent early in the week to put in an appearance on Thursday, but I
have no information as to whether or not this actually took place, and I’m not
quite to the stage of writing fictional field reports. . .yet.
Yesterday’s turnout was
light early in the day. I split very early. Despite having
desnotted my ancient Banshee (unflown since 2004) in advance, my formerly
“best” motor, a George Aldrich reworked and chromed OS .35S, exhibited almost
no compression whatever and absolutely refused to start. It did, however,
manage to kick back exactly once and wreck another of my rapidly diminishing
supply of new Rev-Up 10x6s. I want to publicly apologize to everyone
there for my having vented my frustrations in front of everybody. I will
apparently never grow up. See, I told you I was temperamentally
unsuitable for this job.
Should the Nag Format Change?
My tech guru, without
whose assistance the Nag would be a garbled mess (really), has advised me
emphatically that the format I’ve been using is “all wrong,” and that “Nobody
in his right mind does [things] that way.” Specifically, he objects to my
presenting the Nag as a straight e-mail, and insists that sending it as a Word
document attached to an e-mail header is the only sane way to go.
I personally see both
advantages and disadvantages intrinsic to each method. The current pure
e-mail format is somewhat harder to edit, but it has the advantages (at least
to my so-called mind) of immediate accessibility and, being stored in “the
Cloud,” not crapping up all your hard drives. On the other hand, sending
it out as a downloadable attachment under an e-mail header makes it at least
potentially easier to edit, and gives the subscribers an opportunity to
maintain an archive of “magazines” on their own equipment as opposed to storage
in e-mail accounts which are potentially liable to deletion.
Additionally, I am given to understand that certain “mailer” programs
really scramble the Nag’s format, but not having received a single complaint to
date on this point, this may not be an issue with current subscribers.
Like any good monkey, I
am probably capable of eventually being trained to do either, though at this
point I’m still largely incompetent at both. Therefore, let the
customers’ preference reign supreme. Let me know before next Sunday how
you want it. I’m only going
to ask this once, and the majority who reply this week will get their
way, so don’t kvetch (a Yiddish word which for our purposes shall mean “whine
and moan”) if you don’t express your preference.
Upcoming Competition Note
In case you’ve been
living under a rock, be aware that the Knights of the Round Circle will be
conducting the annual Bob Palmer Memorial contest on April 23-24. Bob, a
pioneer in the stunt world and world-class competitor, was a long-time member
of the VCB, and I urge everyone who can to turn out in commemoration of his
life and achievements. I will once again be judging, so I’ll know who
shows up. . .
Unofficial Fun Stuff
Playmate of the Week
The title of our weekly
photo feature has been changed to face the reality that it is impossible
(unless otherwise instructed by the tech guru) to physically fold an
e-document. This week’s contributions come to us once again from the
camera work of Chris Forbes.
Chris describes this
nifty profile ship as a P-51D (although cogniscenti will recognize it as a B/C
variant) from a Brodak kit. The fuselage and empennage (tail feathers, if
you’ve never taken French) are finished in Sig butyrate over silkspan, with the
wings done up in Coverite iron-on with Monokote trim tape. Grunt up front
is provided by an OS .40FP “reworked and fitted with a button head by Tom”
(Muggleton?), fed by a 4 oz. uniflow tank and spinning an APC 10.5x4.5.
The P-51, although far
more understated in its appearance than his justly renowned Spiderman Nobler,
has to be seen close up to be appreciated. Check out the detail trim on
the nose tripler and spinner. Also, see if you can pick up any color
differential between the sheeted and open areas of covering. Metallics,
particularly silver, are hideously unforgiving of craftsmanship lapses.
Never mind the photos, check out this bird in person and see if you find
any flaws. If you can, you will be the new appearance judge at our next
contest.
Chris adds, “And this is
how I like to fly it!”
I’m not going to
even try to intuit what Chris means by this. Ask him
yourself if curious.
Alternative Flying Opportunity
Paul Wescott, one of our
more southerly located members, who shares his loyalties with the Knights of
the Round Circle, informs the Nag that there exists a quasi-reliable flying
session at the Whittier Narrows field every Friday morning. Flying
typically starts around 9 a.m. and continues through 11:30 or noon, after which
the group typically retires to Mario’s Tacos or some coffee shop to shoot the
shizzle. Norm Furutani (who, incidentally, I understand publishes some
kind of Nag analog on Thursdays) appears to be the primary organizer and
carpool leader behind this activity. Paul notes that the entrance fee to
Whittier Narrows which we have come to expect on contest days does not apply to
weekday flying. For those with Fridays available, particularly members
living in the southern and eastern reaches of our draw area, might find this to
be an attractive addition to our existing flying opportunities, and help
further cement bonds between the two clubs.
Wanna Go Flying?
For once, I’m not
particularly stoked for a midweek session. The taxes need to be done, and
entropy has assaulted my home and yard with a vengeance while I was in Tucson.
On top of that, since I’m currently too chicken[substance] to fly my
Oriental, and everything else seems to have crashed and/or burned, at the
moment I’m pretty much down to my Magican (No, not Magician, Magican).
Still, I could probably be coaxed/sweet-talked/subverted into making a
Basin run. State some intent in these pages and avoid the rush.
A Promise Broken
At about this point in
last week’s Nag, I promised you a “how-to” articlette on repairing tears in
silkspan and tissue coverings using Saran (or similar brand) Wrap. Due to
the length of this week’s Nag, I am electing to postpone the discussion until
next week. If for some reason you absolutely need the information before
next week, call me.
I have now exhausted the
rush of photos that flooded in when I started doing this. This means that
until fresh content arrives, you will be looking at photos from my personal
archives which, although not necessarily related to our club, are probably
worth a glance. I don’t care much. Do you?
TTFN
Until next time. .
.
No comments:
Post a Comment